Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
▲提示词：画面中，【东方明珠广播电视塔】被一只超级巨大、超级可爱的【猫】占据。周围的建筑物看起来就像玩具模型一样小，而【猫】则非常巨大。游戏背景设定在一个逼真的城市环境中。整体氛围安静、温暖、舒缓、可爱。
，推荐阅读safew官方版本下载获取更多信息
Ukrainian drones hit Russian oil depot in occupied Luhansk overnight – video，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
更多详细新闻请浏览新京报网 www.bjnews.com.cn